Case Study: Torsion Bar Supply for a construction contractor in Southern Africa
Source:Case /
Time:2026-09-18
Torsion Bar for A construction contractor in Southern Africa
A construction contractor came to us with a torsion bar programme for Southern Africa. The brief was ordinary and unforgiving at the same time: a fixed launch window, a landed cost that had to survive freight and duty, and a part that had to match an existing sample. This case records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order landed.
The starting point
- Warranty claims traced back to a single lot
- A supplier who changed material without saying so
- Premature wear on the first batch

What was specified
| Part | Torsion Bar |
|---|---|
| Client | A construction contractor |
| Market | Southern Africa |
| Volume | 5,000 pieces across 3 specifications |
| Base material | PVC Coated Fabric |
| Sampling rounds | 2 |
| Delivery window | 5 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | CCC |
How it was resolved
- The specification was rebuilt around PVC Coated Fabric and the tolerance locked before bulk.
- A pre-production sample was approved and kept as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
- Documentation shipped with the goods instead of after them.

Result
- 5,000 pieces delivered inside the 5-week window.
- Unit cost held within 1.5% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 0.5%.
- The specification is on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Keep one accountable owner on both sides. Most delays come from hand-offs, not from machines.
Planning something similar?
Share a sample or a drawing and we will quote against a written specification, not against a photograph.



