Case Study: Trailing Arm Supply for a mining contractor in Central Asia
Source:Case /
Time:2026-09-18
Trailing Arm for A mining contractor in Central Asia
A mining contractor came to us with a trailing arm programme for Central Asia. The brief was ordinary and unforgiving at the same time: a fixed launch window, a landed cost that had to survive freight and duty, and a part that had to match an existing sample. This case records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order landed.
The starting point
- A specification nobody had written down
- A fitment that looked right on paper and failed on the bench
- Warranty claims traced back to a single lot
What was specified
| Part | Trailing Arm |
|---|---|
| Client | A mining contractor |
| Market | Central Asia |
| Volume | 50,000 pieces across 4 specifications |
| Base material | Powder Coated Steel |
| Sampling rounds | 3 |
| Delivery window | 10 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | RoHS |
How it was resolved
- The specification was rebuilt around Powder Coated Steel and the tolerance locked before bulk.
- A pre-production sample was approved and kept as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
- Documentation shipped with the goods instead of after them.
Result
- 50,000 pieces delivered inside the 10-week window.
- Unit cost held within 4.5% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.0%.
- The specification is on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Approve a pre-production sample made from the actual bulk material. Substitute material behaves differently in service.
Planning something similar?
Send the specification you are working to and we will confirm what we can match, what we would change and why.
