Case Study: Central Locking Kit Supply for a mining contractor in South Asia
Source:Case /
Time:2026-09-18
Central Locking Kit for A mining contractor in South Asia
A mining contractor came to us with a central locking kit programme for South Asia. The brief was ordinary and unforgiving at the same time: a fixed launch window, a landed cost that had to survive freight and duty, and a part that had to match an existing sample. This case records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order landed.
The starting point
- Reorders that did not match the approved sample
- Premature wear on the first batch
- A fitment that looked right on paper and failed on the bench
What was specified
| Part | Central Locking Kit |
|---|---|
| Client | A mining contractor |
| Market | South Asia |
| Volume | 50,000 pieces across 6 specifications |
| Base material | Neoprene |
| Sampling rounds | 2 |
| Delivery window | 5 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | CCC |
How it was resolved
- The specification was rebuilt around Neoprene and the tolerance locked before bulk.
- A pre-production sample was approved and kept as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
- Documentation shipped with the goods instead of after them.
Result
- 50,000 pieces delivered inside the 5-week window.
- Unit cost held within 2.0% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.0%.
- The specification is on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Keep one accountable owner on both sides. Most delays come from hand-offs, not from machines.
Planning something similar?
Tell us the model, the fitment and the quantity and we will hold a production slot for you.
